video record police

Here’s the deal: as a resident of the U.S.A. you have the right to record the police in the course of their public duties. The police don’t have a right to stop you as long as you’re not interfering with their work. They also don’t have a right to confiscate your phone or camera, or delete its contents, just because you were recording them. Had a citizen not recorded the shooting of Walter Scott, few of us would have likely heard a peep about that story.

Despite some state laws that make it illegal to record others without their consent, federal courts have held consistently that citizens have a First Amendment right to record the police as they perform their official duties in public. The Supreme Court also recently affirmed that the Fourth Amendment, protecting citizens from arbitrary searches and seizures, means that cops need to “get a warrant” if they want to take your cellphone.  And the US Department of Justice under Obama has affirmed the court’s stances by reminding police departments that they’re not allowed to harass citizens for recording them.

Sadly these rights are not always respected by the police. Even journalists are being harassed in the course of their reporting. Last year, Washington Post reporter Wesley Lowrey and Huffington Post reporter Ryan Reilly were arrested in a McDonalds and later released with no explanation. Washington Post executive editor Martin D. Baron said Lowrey was “illegally instructed to stop taking video of officers,” and then “slammed against a soda machine and then handcuffed.”

Screen Shot 2015-05-25 at 10.49.35 AM





Screen Shot 2015-05-25 at 10.49.43 AM

It’s obviously bad when reporters are being arrested for no reason, but it’s important to remember that all citizens — anybody who’s old enough to operate a smartphone — has a right to record the official activities of police in public.

The Post editor Marty Baron noted in his statement responding to the incident that the order to stop filming was illegal. Courts have held that, as a general rule, individuals have a right to record law enforcement officers carrying out their duties in public spaces. And as the video archive of questionable police tactics from citizen observers grows, it’s clear there’s a certain benefit to keeping a digital eye on the police: Knowing there is a record of their actions can help put everyone on their best behavior — or at least make sure there’s evidence of misbehavior when it occurs.

Organizations like PINAC (photography is not a crime) have sprung up in recent years as well to educate people as well as share videos. In one recent article on PINAC a North Carolina police officer told a man he needed his phone as evidence before snatching the phone and trying to destroy it by slamming it to the ground.

Many police stations have long recorded at least some of their officers’ interactions with the public, most frequently through dashboard cameras that capture traffic stops. Indeed, elsewhere in the world — such as Russia — car owners often purchase their own dashcams to gather evidence for insurance purposes and to record their interactions with the police and others.

But there’s also a growing movement in the United States to have on-duty officers use body cameras to record their interactions with the public. Police officers in Rialto, Calif., started wearing cameras in February 2012. The result? The volume of complaints filed against officers fell by 88 percent compared with the previous year, and use of force by officers fell by almost 60 percent, according to the New York Times. The tactic adds an extra layer of accountability on police actions and creates a record that officers can fall back on if their account differs from that of an arrestee.

I don’t think anyone would argue that the police should keep these recorded videos for an extended amount of time. If there are no flags or controversy then these videos should be erased likely after a week or two and only ones that get flagged should be kept longer. It seems like keeping a digital eye on the police can be a powerful tool for checking the power imbalance between citizens and the law enforcement agents who interact with them.

So if a cop tries to tell you that you cannot video record as long as you are not interfering with the police they are wrong. THE ONLY way to keep the First Amendment as a right is to remind over-reaching authorities that it is there. Law enforcement absolutely can be videotaped and photographed as long as you do not interfere with policing.

Be polite, but be firm. Calmly but firmly say that you are doing your job as a citizen journalist. Be respectful, but firm.   Today, almost anyone with a phone is a citizen photographer or videographer. They are the eyes and ears, the reporters in a time of disappearing media. Full and freely obtained information is vital to democracy, and we must fervently remind those we employ in government of that precious right, which protects them, too.

Know Your rights

Courtesy of the ACLU. Taking photographs and videos of things that are plainly visible from public spaces is your constitutional right. That includes federal buildings, transportation facilities, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties. Unfortunately, law enforcement officers often order people to stop taking photographs or video in public places, and sometimes harass, detain or even arrest people who use their cameras or cell phone recording devices in public.

Your Right to Take Videos and Photographs

video-record-policeWhen in outdoor public spaces where you are legally present, you have the right to capture any image that is in plain view (see note below about sound recording). That includes pictures and videos of federal buildings, transportation facilities (including airports), and police officers.

  • When you are on private property, the property owner sets the rules about the taking of photographs or videos. If you disobey property owners’ rules, they can order you off their property (and have you arrested for trespassing if you do not comply).
  • Police should not order you to stop taking pictures or video. Under no circumstances should they demand that you delete your photographs or video.
  • Police officers may order citizens to cease activities that are truly interfering with legitimate law enforcement operations. In general, a court will trust an officer’s judgment about what is “interfering” more than yours. So if an officer orders you to stand back, do so.
  • If the officer says he/she will arrest you if you continue to use your camera, in most circumstances it is better to put the camera away and call the ACLU for help, rather than risking arrest.
  • Police officers may not generally confiscate or demand to view your photographs or video or search the contents your cell phone without a warrant. In addition, it is possible that courts may approve the seizure of a camera in some circumstances if police have a reasonable, good-faith belief that it contains evidence of a crime by someone other than the police themselves (it is unsettled whether they still need a warrant to view them).

Using a Video Recorder (Including Cell Phones) With Audio Capacity

You have a right to capture images in public places, but you don’t always have a right to record what people say. Different states have different laws so check your state law here.  Conversations with police in the course of their duties are not private conversations, but many other things you may record on a public street are.

  • You have the right to videotape and audiotape police officers performing official duties in public. It is not a violation of most state Wiretap Laws to do so. That means you can record an officer during a traffic stop, during an interrogation, or while he or she is making an arrest.
  • You can record people protesting or giving speeches in public.

If You Are Stopped or Detained for Taking Photographs or Videos

  • Always remain polite and never physically resist a police officer.
  • If stopped for photography, ask if you are free to go. If the officer says no, then you are being detained, something an officer cannot do without reasonable suspicion that you have or are about to commit a crime or are in the process of doing so. Until you ask to leave, your being stopped is considered voluntary under the law and is legal.
  • If you are detained, politely state that you believe you have the right to take pictures or video and that you do not consent to the officer looking through or deleting anything on your camera. But if the officer reaches for your camera or phone, do not resist. Simply repeat that you do not consent to any search or seizure.

You don’t want to invite a charge for “resisting arrest.” Police use “resisting arrest” now as their free pass to arrest you even though you have done nothing wrong to be arrested for. It should at many times be called the contempt-of-cop law instead.  Once you resist arrest then you are doing something wrong so just cooperate and file charges against the wrongful arrest later. Here is a great guide on filing an official complaint. 

Remember, citizens must assert their state and federal constitutional rights or we will soon forget they even exist and so will the police.

By Alan Wood

Musings of an unabashed and unapologetic liberal deep in the heart of a Red State. Crusader against obscurantism. Optimistic curmudgeon, snark jockey, lovably opinionated purveyor of wisdom and truth. Multi-lingual world traveler and part-time irreverent philosopher who dabbles in writing, political analysis, and social commentary. Attempting to provide some sanity and clarity to complex issues with a dash of sardonic wit and humor. Thanks for visiting!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.