Why We Need More Women in The Senate

Out of the 100 U.S. Senators only 20 are female at the moment even though more than 50% of our population are women. I am not in favor of quotas in any way, shape, or form and firmly believe jobs and elected offices should be given to someone based on their qualifications and abilities over their gender or race. So exactly how are the 16 Democratic and 4 Republican female Senators doing in comparison to their male counterparts in terms of job performance? By all accounts, a hell of a lot better job!

The video and the article below is from an ABC News report by Diane Sawyer back in 2013 but all the points are just as valid today as back then.

If Republicans take control of the Senate, there are only two female senators currently in line to take over committees, and it’s unclear if they would even get those posts. So it’s no wonder that McCaskill and other female senators have been feverishly raising money to help women in tight races that analysts say could decide control of the Senate, including re-election bids by Kay Hagan in North Carolina, Mary Landrieu in Louisiana and Jean Shaheen in New Hampshire.

“We have finally gotten to the point where we have women in significant positions of power,” with female senators having real sway over “how our government works,” McCaskill said. Those gains are in jeopardy in this election, she said.

Committee chairs decide which topics receive hearings, which legislation gets voted on and what may be included in those bills. Democratic women currently hold the gavel in Senate committees governing the budget, spending, agriculture, environment, small business, ethics, Indian affairs and intelligence.

McCaskill and her female colleagues say the importance of having women in the Senate is not just about numbers and retaining the majority; it’s about legislating. They point to successful efforts by Agriculture Chairwoman Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., to pass a farm bill, by Sen. Patty Murray to pass the first budget in years, by Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., to pass funding for that budget, and by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., to pass a water resources development law.

Those women have pushed some of the largest pieces of legislation through an otherwise gridlocked Congress in the past two years, and all required overcoming objections from and negotiating with Republicans.

“All of these women are in very important positions, and they are doing great work,” McCaskill said. They’ve been successful because “they’re workhorses, not show horses,” she said.

“They’re more interested in getting things done than fighting,” she said. “And they’re not as interested in getting the credit as many others who have held those positions in the past.”

McCaskill said female politicians tend to take a measured, bipartisan approach and draw on their strengths as “nurturers and negotiators.”

“We’re trying to make peace constantly in our families,” she said, and it’s a “natural role” that women have taken on in politics as well.

Academic research has found that women in the U.S. Senate are more focused than men on social policy. In “Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate,” author and researcher Michele L. Swers found that “female senators are more active proponents of legislation related to women, children, and families.

“Whether it’s our fight to make sure birth control is included in insurance just like Viagra, or whether it’s continuing to work at the disparity in pay, those things will suffer if the Republicans take control of the Senate,” she said. “I think there’s a real price that will be paid for women in this country.”

David Perdue if elected would simply be a MiniMe for people like Mrs. Lindsey Graham, the great bloviator of the Senate with perfect 20/20 hindsight vision but legally blind when it comes to looking to the future. He already said he would only serve two terms which would make him a lame duck from day 1 and would not get appointed to head any committees. Anyone else wonder when Graham will have his Larry Craig moment?

In a very raucous Georgia Senate debate on Tuesday night, Nunn offered this in response to businessman David Perdue’s (R) attempts to link her to Obama :

My name is on the ballot. We have two more years of President Obama, and then we will have another president, and we need someone who is going to work with and respect whoever is the president to actually get things done on behalf of the American people.

After Obama leaves office, then what’s your vision?’ Nunn is asking. Michelle Nunn should have also pointed out that House Republicans are more unpopular than Obama. The House Republicans for the past 5+ years, have been obsessed with Obama Care so much so, that they did nothing else but shut down the Government. Now we see they will do the same dangerous thing once the Elections are over, threatening to shut it down. A vote for Republicans is a vote for the status quo of doing nothing but bicker and take vacations at the expense of the American tax payer.

And if Linsey Graham doesn’t scare you then Mitch McConnell should. The real Turtleman from Kentucky. This career politician makes Harry Reid look like a saint by comparison. He has been voted among the most corrupt in Congress to boot. here is a list of 17 reasons why no one in Georgia should hope he becomes leader of the Senate. Hopefully he will be defeated in his re-election bid. If you are from Kentucky and don’t know the words to this song, it is safe to say you are out of touch. Imagine a Georgia Senator that couldn’t sing Georgia on My Mind for example.

Screen Shot 2014-10-09 at 10.11.27 PMIt remains to be seen whether Georgia voters will give a Deomocratic candidate a chance after a 20 year hiatus. She is certainly an attractive candidate with her promise to work across the aisle and strive for bipartisanship. David Perdue has promised to do the exact opposite. One thing is for sure, female U.S. Senators from both parties have proven these last two years they are among the very few able to act like adults and get things done while people like John McCain prefer to strut in front of cameras and give speeches.

I wish Nunn would have added “I am running to help this President and not be one more angry do-nothing  obstructionist who would shut down the government, not fund the VA and give this nation more AUSTERITY when it is clear people on MAIN STREET needs government more than PEOPLE ON WALL STREET. While you continue to outsource I will help this President all I can, but when he implements actions that might hurt Georgia, the first thing I am going to do is ask him to explain and secondly I am going to give him OUR perspective as a NATIVE GEORGIAN, and then I will tell him why I can not vote for this particular action…But if his plan works for Georgia, YOU CAN BET YOUR LAST DOLLAR I will not shut down the government. I will tell him when he is wrong. You are right when it is good for the nation and good for Georgia, I will give this President as well as any President regardless of party the backing he or she needs…

Overall I think Michelle Nunn did a great job and won the debate. I also firmly believe she wants to serve as Senator to help Georgia while Perdue views this as another notch on his belt and a ticket to high-paid lobbying when he leaves the Senate. Since he promised to only serve two terms he is also guaranteed to not serve in any positions of power as a committee chairman.

 

 

Meet the New Class: The Senate Swears in a Historic 20 Female Senators 

Today the Senate will make history, swearing in a record-breaking 20 female senators — four Republicans and 16 Democrats — in office.

As the 113th Congress is sworn in today on Capitol Hill, ABC “World News” anchor Diane Sawyer has an exclusive joint interview with the historic class of female senators.

Diane Sawyer’s complete interview will air on “World News” and “Nightline” tonight.

“I can’t tell you the joy that I feel in my heart to look at these 20 gifted and talented women from two different parties, different zip codes to fill this room,” Sen. Barbara Mikulksi, D-Md., said while surrounded by the group of women senators. “In all of American history only 16 women had served. Now there are 20 of us.”

Senator-elect Deb Fischer, R-Neb., today becomes the first women to be elected as a senator in Nebraska.

“It was an historic election,” Fischer said, “But what was really fun about it were the number of mothers and fathers who brought their daughters up to me during the campaign and said, “Can we get a picture? Can we get a picture?’ Because people realize it and — things do change, things do change.”

The women senators all agree that women will be getting things done in this new Congress, a sign of optimism felt for the new Congress, after the bruising battles of the 112th Congress.

“We’re in force and we’re in leadership positions, but it’s not just the position that we hold. I can tell you this is a can-do crowd,” Mikulski said of both Democrats and Republican senators in the room. “We are today ready to be a force in American politics.”

And while the number of women in the Senate today makes history, many of the women agreed that they want to keep fighting to boost those numbers.

Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said that women are still “underrepresented” in the Senate.

“I think that until we get to 50, we still have to fight because it’s still a problem,” Boxer said. “I think this class as you look around, Republicans and Democrats. … I think that because of this new class and the caliber of the people coming and the quality of the people coming, I think that hopefully in my lifetime — and I really do hope and pray this is the case — we will see 50 percent. ”

No Sorority Here, Even With the Will to Work Together

The cooperation does not make them a “sorority,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., says. There are real differences in ideology and personality and they don’t want their gender to define them as senators.

But the women also admit that they believe having more women in the room would help in fierce negotiations, compromise and legislating on Capitol Hill, traits they say do not come as naturally to their male colleagues in the Senate. That sentiment enjoys bipartisan support among the women of the Senate.

“What I find is with all due deference to our male colleagues, that women’s styles tend to be more collaborative,” Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said by nature women are “less confrontational.” Sen-elect Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, says that women are “problem solvers.”

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., says that women have a camaraderie which helps in relationships that are key to negotiations on Capitol Hill, something she says comes natural to women more than men.

“I think there’s just a lot of collaboration between the women senators and… advice and really standing up for each other that you don’t always see with the men,” she said.

Feinstein said that women are more effective working in Congress because of these traits that they bring to the table.

“We’re less on testosterone,” Feinstein said. “We don’t have that need to always be confrontational. And I think we’re problem solvers, and I think that’s what this country needs.”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, agreed.

“Maybe it is the testosterone that you speak to, Dianne, or the ego that is attached there. But I look at what I have been asked to do by the people of Alaska, and it’s pretty serious stuff. And it’s not the title, but it’s the responsibility that comes with the service that I think makes a difference,” Murkowski said.

In the combative halls of Congress, McCaskill argued that for all these reasons women can get beyond “team mentality” of Democrats vs. Republicans and work towards a better goal.

“Having us in the room… not only do we want to work in a bipartisan way, we do it,” McCaskill said. “We actually work together, Republicans and Democrats, and women- try to look at solving the problem rather than just going political points.”

But the women agree that just because their natural tendencies lean toward problem solving, camaraderie and compromise it does not mean they don’t fight for what they believe in, which at times can be markedly different from their female counterpart on the other side of the aisle.

“That doesn’t mean that we think alike, and it doesn’t mean that we don’t span the ideological spectrum,” Collins said. “I always push back the idea that there are women’s issues. Because every issue from war to taxes to education affect women in this country. And that’s why the point of having women be represented on all committees and leading many of them is so important.”

Reproductive rights

One of those ideological differences that often divides the two parties, and oftentimes women as well, is the issue of reproductive rights.

Last year the issue took a center stage in the 2012 presidential campaign as well as in races across the country during the congressional elections as a highly polarized and emotionally charged topic.

The senators showed there is disagreement among them on abortion, reproductive health decisions and even disagreement as to what leadership role women and Congress should play in the debates ahead.

“I’m pro-choice,” Collins said. “But I think those issues should be settled and should not be the main focus of debate. To me those issues, Roe v. Wade, is settled law and I don’t know why we would want to keep bringing those issues up. I think we should be focusing like a laser on job creation, the economy, health care, education, foreign policy, national security. Those issues to me are settled.”

Sen-elect Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., disagreed, saying Republicans put those issues onto the Congressional radar screen.

“I don’t think they are entirely settled,” Warren said, “I have to say I was really shocked that those are powerful issues in 2012. I would like to think those things are settled. But they were forced forward as issues by people who thought that women should not have that kind of access. And boy, if that’s the case, then we better stand up and we better speak out.”

Can Women Fix Washington’s Dysfunction?

The 112th Congress may be best known for long-drawn out fights, fierce partisanship and little to show legislatively for the year.

The senators argue, at the dawn of a new Congress, that having more women in leadership positions and in the ranks as members will help improve the outlook for a more productive year.

Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., says that women “leave their ego at the door and “more natural consensus builders.” She said because of those traits women should be elected into more positions in Congress.

“If the major issue of our era right now is the stalemate of Congress, then the message to the American people should be elect more consensus builders to get the job done,” Cantwell said.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., said that if Washington is ever going to be fixed she believes “it’s women who are going to lead the way.”

The senator says she’s spoken to President Obama about this very issue, mentioning to the president that the women have a habit of meeting regularly on a bipartisan basis for dinner. The president, she said, plans on hosting the women of the Senate at the White House soon.

“When I saw President Obama a few weeks ago I told him about our quarterly dinners and I said, ‘Mr. President, if you want to see bipartisanship in Washington invited the women senators to help you get it done.’ And he loved the idea and he plans to invite us to the White House.”

Predictions for a Female President

Among the senators there was unanimity in predicting, and hoping, that there will be a female president soon, perhaps as early as 2016.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said here too there is a key difference between how men and women express their personal and political ambitions.

“I think the thing is, is that every man wakes up in the morning and looks in the mirror and says, ‘I could be president.’ I think every woman looks in the mirror and says, ‘What can I get done for my country today?’ ”

Feinstein jokingly corrected her noting that a few times she’s toyed with the idea in the midst of a particularly bad episode of Washington gridlock.

“Well, you may think it from time to time,” Feinstein said smiling at the prospect. “Usually when you’re very frustrated you think… ‘If I were president I could get this done.'”

Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., shared a story about her 8-year-old daughter, Kate, who came home one day and told her mother that she didn’t want her to run for president because she herself wanted to be the first female president.

“Well she better call Hillary [Clinton],” Boxer quipped of their former colleague in the Senate, widely believed to have a shot at the White House should she run in 2016.

“Did you break the news to her we’re not waiting that long?” McCaskill asked with a laugh.

Ayotte smiling said she didn’t want to break the news to her daughter that there potentially could be a female president before her daughter is of age. She said she told her: “Listen, your mom’s going to campaign across the country for you.”

About The Author

Reply